How it works

Five steps from soil data to evidence

Diagnose the cause, plan the work, implement it in the field, monitor the same indicators and improve the next cycle.

The improvement loop

Five actions. Monitoring makes the result verifiable.

The same sequence guides one farm, a supplier program or a regional portfolio.

Diagnose
Plan
Implement
Monitor
Verification
Improve
↻ every cycle builds the evidence

Field evidence

Real tools and a repeatable protocol

Four field checks reveal structure, compaction, roots and nutrient uptake. A consistent protocol makes visits comparable.

Agronomist measuring a coffee plant in the field
Measure the same field, compare it with a control and record what changes.

VESS

A visual soil-structure score from a spade sample.

Penetrometer

Measures how deep and hard compaction is around the roots.

Root pit and slake test

Shows root growth, soil layers and whether aggregates hold together.

Soil and leaf comparison

Reveals nutrients that exist in the soil but are not reaching the plant.

Comparable by design

Use the same GPS point, depth, crop stage and field conditions on each visit. Organize the findings with the 5M method, then compare the treated plot with a control.

Honest by default

A pilot tests the cause before it becomes a claim

Targets are not results. A result is published only after the same indicators have been measured against a baseline and control.

Demo and control plots

Every pilot includes a comparison plot so change can be attributed.

A meaningful sample

At least 50 trees per lot, not one hand-picked row.

Honest timelines

Early signals can appear in 0 to 3 months. Degraded perennial systems may take 2 to 3 years.

Independent recommendations

No input sale sits behind the diagnosis or dosage.

Test the five-step loop on a pilot.

Start with a demo and control lot, then watch the evidence build.

See sample reports